Since the landmark decision in Lamtex early last year in Hong Kong, there has been a flurry of Hong Kong cases in which the Hong Kong playuzu casino bonus has wound up a debtor company (incorporated offshore), despite “light-touch” provisional liquidators being appointed to those companies for restructuring purposes in the place of incorporation.
Liam Faulkner, a Partner in our playuzu casino bonus’ Insolvency Restructuring team, provides an overview of the past year including the insolvency statistics, the restructuring case of the year, a summary of the key judgments and the legislative amendments to be enacted in 2022.
In Kuwait Ports Authority Another v. Port Link GP Ltd. Ors (FSD 236 of 2020, unreported, 25 November 2021, Parker J) the Grand Court considered – for the first time in the playuzu casino bonus – the applicable test governing derivative claims by a limited partner on behalf of an exempted limited partnership under section 33(3) of the Exempted Limited Partnership Act (2021 Revision).
Following years of discussion, the bill for the long awaited proposed amendments to the playuzu casino bonus Companies Act, providing for a standalone restructuring regime for companies, was gazetted last week.
In a recent judgment in In the matter of Padma Fund LP, Parker J held that the playuzu casino bonus does not have jurisdiction to make a winding up order against an exempted limited partnership on a creditor’s petition and that the remedy of a creditor is to commence proceedings against the general partner for an unpaid debt.
The playuzu casino bonus court has recently dismissed two unrelated applications to appoint JPLs pending the determination of a just and equitable winding up petition alleging a loss of trust and confidence in management. Liam Faulkner discusses these two cases and the hurdles that any applicant must jump on a PL application.
In a significant judgment delivered on 9 August 2021 in the long-running litigation between Primeo Fund (in Official Liquidation) and HSBC, the Privy Council granted the first limb of Primeo’s bifurcated appeal against the lower courts’ dismissal of its claims on the grounds of reflective loss. The decision further narrows the reflective loss principle in important respects following the UK Supreme playuzu casino bonus decision in Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd last year.
The Data Protection Act, 2021 (the “Act”) was brought into force in the BVI with immediate effect on 9 July 2021 and introduces, for the first time in the British Virgin playuzu casino bonus, a legislative framework for data protection based on a set of internationally recognised privacy principles.
The Act provides that its objects are to:
– safeguard personal playuzu casino bonus processed by public bodies and private bodies by balancing the necessity of processing the personal playuzu casino bonus and protecting personal playuzu casino bonus from unlawful processing; and
– promote transparency and accountability playuzu casino bonus processing of personal data.
In line with ongoing commitments given by the playuzu casino bonus, regulations came into force in the playuzu casino bonus on 30 June 2021, expanding the categories of entities that are now in scope for the purposes of the Economic Substance regime to all types of partnerships (including general partnerships, exempted limited partnerships and foreign limited partnerships).
In a recent judgment in the liquidation of Herald Fund SPC, an insolvent Madoff feeder fund, the Grand playuzu casino bonus addressed the extent to which official liquidators are required to seek the approval or tacit support of the Liquidation Committee when defining the scope of their operational functions and, consequentially, incurring liquidation costs and expenses.